Santa Barbara County’s new Hoop Structures Ordinance was upheld after a lawsuit for a lack of environmental review charged the analysis understated the potential problems associated with hoop houses, especially in their use in cannabis cultivation. | Credit: Melinda Burns Photos

Judge Thomas Anderle rejected a lawsuit filed by the Coalition for Responsible Cannabis that challenged the adequacy of the environmental review conducted as part of the County of Santa Barbara’s controversial new hoop-house ordinance, passed by the Board of Supervisors last year. The cannabis coalition, represented by attorney Marc Chytilo, argued that the county supervisors so changed the terms of the proposed ordinance from what the county’s Planning Commission initially reviewed and what the Environmental Impact Report had analyzed that additional environmental analysis was needed.

While Chytilo has a history of success with such cases in Judge Anderle’s courtroom, Anderle bought none of Chytilo’s arguments in this case. Chytilo represents vintner Blair Pence, who has been waging an expensive campaign to slow down the spread of what he’s termed unchecked cannabis in the Santa Ynez Valley. Because hoop structures are much used by inland cannabis operators — to reduce solar scorching and conserve water, among other reasons — Pence and the coalition had lobbied the supervisors to impose greater restrictions and zoning requirements on the erection of new hoop houses for cannabis cultivation in the county’s new Hoop Structures Ordinance.


Get the top stories in your inbox by signing up for our daily newsletter, Indy Today.

Continue reading

Subscribe for Exclusive Content, Full Video Access, Premium Events, and More!

Subscribe

Login

Please note this login is to submit events or press releases. Use this page here to login for your Independent subscription

Not a member? Sign up here.