Late last summer, attorney Marc Chytilo delivered what he believed to be a serious haymaker aimed at the collective jaws of 22 of the 31 cannabis operators then drawing water from the Santa Ynez River. Chytilo, representing the Santa Barbara Coalition for Responsible Cannabis, filed an administrative action against the State Water Resources Control Board, charging that it had abdicated its legal responsibility to monitor or enforce state laws governing water extraction from the Santa Ynez River for purposes of cannabis cultivation. Earlier this month, that same state water board issued a finding decreeing that no abdication had, in fact, taken place because Chytilo had overstated his case and that the state water board did not, in fact, have the jurisdiction Chytilo had asserted.
At issue is whether the water relied upon by the cannabis cultivators in question was pumped from what hydrogeologists define as “sub-surface streams”: streams that flow like an impenetrable straw under the floor of the river and are in no way fed by the waters flowing overhead. If the water were pumped from such streams, it would fall within the purview of the state water board.
But according to Karen Kramer, environmental program manager for the state water board, none of the river alluvium Chytilo referenced in his complaint had officially been designated “a subterranean stream.” Until such a designation takes place, Kramer added, the monitoring and enforcement of water rights along the river is not a matter for the state board to adjudicate.